jump to navigation

Online Case Study for a Consultant Position September 12, 2005

Posted by Coolguy in IT Career.
Tags:
trackback

On-Line Case Study Questions and Answers

Question 1

Client Goal: Should Great Burger acquire Heavenly Doughnuts as part of its growth strategy? Our client is Great Burger (GB) a fast food chain that competes head–to-head with McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Burger King, KFC, etc. Description of Great BurgerGB is the fourth largest fast food chain worldwide, measured by the number of stores in operation. As most of its competitors do, GB offers food and “combos” for the three largest meal occasions: breakfast, lunch and dinner.Even though GB owns some of its stores, it operates under the franchising business model with 85% of its stores owned by franchisees (individuals own & manage stores, pay franchise fee to GB, but major business decisions e.g., menu, look of store controlled by GB).McKinsey studyAs part of its growth strategy GB has analyzed some potential acquisition targets including Heavenly Donuts (HD), a growing doughnut producer with both a US and international store presence.HD operates under the franchising business model too, though a little bit differently than GB. While GB franchises restaurants, HD franchises areas or regions in which the franchisee is required to open a certain number of stores.GB’s CEO has hired McKinsey to advise him on whether they should acquire HD or not. Q: What areas would you want to explore to determine whether GB should acquire HD? A: Some possible areas are given below. Great job if you identified several of these and perhaps others.

  • Stand alone value of HD
  • Growth in market for doughnuts
  • HD’s past and projected future sales growth (break down into growth in number of stores, and growth in same store sales)
  • Competition – are there any other major national chains that are doing better than HD in terms of growth/profit. What does this imply for future growth?
  • Profitability/profit margin
  • Capital required to fund growth (capital investment to open new stores, working capital)
  • Synergies/strategic fit
  • Brand quality similar? Would they enhance or detract from each other if marketed side by side?
  • How much overlap of customer base? (very little overlap might cause concern that brands are not compatible, too much might imply little room to expand sales by cross-marketing)
  • Synergies (Hint: do not dive deep on this, as it will be covered later)
  • Management team/cultural fit
  • Capabilities/skills of top, middle management
  • Cultural fit, if very different, what % of key management would likely be able to adjust
  • Ability to execute merger/combine companies
  • GB experience with mergers in past/experience in integrating companies
  • Franchise structure differences. Detail “dive” into franchising structures. Would these different structures affect the deal? Can we mange two different franchising structures at the same time?

Question 2Q: The team started thinking about potential synergies that could be achieved by acquiring HD.
A: We are looking for a few responses similar to the ones below:

  • Lower costs
  • Biggest opportunity likely in corporate selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A) by integrating corporate management
  • May be some opportunity to lower food costs with larger purchasing volume on similar food items (e.g., beverages, deep frying oil), however overlaps may be low as ingredients are very different
  • GB appears to have an advantage in property and equipment costs which might be leveragable to HD (e.g., superior skills in lease negotiation)
  • Increase revenues
  • Sell doughnuts in GB stores, or some selected GB products in HD stores
  • GB has much greater international presence thus likely has knowledge/skills to enable HD to expand outside of North America
  • GB may have superior skills in identifying attractive locations for stores as its sales per store are higher than industry average, where as HD’s is lower than industry average; might be able to leverage this when opening new HD stores to increase HD average sales per store
  • Expand HD faster then it could do on own–GB, as a larger company with lower debt, may have better access to capital

Question 3Q: The team thinks that with synergies, it should be possible to double HD’s US market share in the next 5 years, and that GB’s access to capital will allow it to expand number HD of stores by 2.5 times. What sales/store will HD require in 5 years in order for GB to achieve these goals? Use any data from Exhibit 1 you need, additionally, your interviewer would provide the following assumptions for you:

  1. Doughnut consumption/capita in the US is $10/year today, and is projected to grow to $20/year in 5 years.
  2. For ease of calculation, assume U.S. population is 300m.

A: Possible responses might include the following:

  1. Market share today: $700M HD sales (from Exhibit 1) ÷ $3B U.S. market ($10 x 300M people) = 23% (round to 25% for simplicity sake)
  2. U.S. market in 5 years = $20 x 300 = $6B
  3. HD sales if double market share: 50% x $6B = $3B
  4. Per store sales: $3B/2.5 (1000 stores) = $1.2M

Does this seem reasonable?

  1. Yes, given it implies less than double same store sales growth and per capita consumption is predicted to double.

Helpful TipYou should always feel free to ask your interviewer additional questions to help you with your response.

Question 4Q: One of the synergies that the team thinks might have a big potential is the idea of increasing the businesses’ overall profitability by selling doughnuts in GB stores. How would you assess the profitability impact of this synergy? A: Some possible answers include:

  1. Calculate incremental revenues by selling doughnuts in GB stores (calculate how many doughnuts per store, times price per doughnut, times number of GB stores)
  2. Calculate incremental costs by selling doughnuts in GB stores (costs of production, incremental number of employees, employee training, software changes, incremental marketing and advertising, incremental cost of distribution if we cannot produce doughnuts in house, etc.)
  3. Calculate incremental investments. Do we need more space in each store if we think we are going to attract new customers? Do we need to invest in store layout to have in-house doughnut production?
  4. If your answer were to take into account cannibalization, what would be the rate of cannibalization with GB offerings? Doughnut cannibalization will be higher with breakfast products than lunch and dinner products, etc.
  5. One way to calculate this cannibalization is to look at historic cannibalization rates with new product/offering launchings within GB stores
  6. Might also cannibalize other HD stores if they are nearby GB store–could estimate this impact by seeing historical change in HD’s sales when competitor doughnut store opens nearby

Question 5Q: What would be the incremental profit per store if we think we are going to sell 50,000 doughnuts per store at a price of $2 per doughnut at a 60 percent margin with a cannibalization rate of 10 percent of GB’s sales?

A: Based on correct calculations, your response should be as follows:Incremental profit = contribution from HD sales less contribution lost due to cannibalized GB sales= 50K units x $2/unit x 60% margin – 300K units x 10% cannibalization x $3/unit x 50% margin= $60K – 45K = 15K incremental profit/storeYour answer was:no Helpful TipWhile you may find that doing straightforward math problems in the context of an interview is a bit tougher, you can see that it is just a matter of breaking the problem down. We are looking at both your ability to set the analysis up properly and then do the math in real time.Question 6 Q: You run into the CEO of GB in the hall. He asks you to summarize McKinsey’s perspective so far on whether GB should acquire HD. Pretend the interviewer is the CEO–what would you say? A: Answers may vary, but here is an example of a response:

  • Early findings lead us to believe acquiring HD would create significant value for GB, and that GB should acquire HD
  • Believe can add $15 thousand in profit per GB store by selling HD in GB stores. This could mean $50 million in incremental profit for North American stores (where immediate synergies are most likely given HD has little brand presence in rest of world)
  • We also believe there are other potential revenue and cost synergies that the team still needs to quantify
  • Once the team has quantified the incremental revenues, cost savings, and investments, we will make a recommendation on the price you should be willing to pay
  • We will also give you recommendations on what it will take to integrate the two companies in order to capture the potential revenue and cost savings, and also to manage the different franchise structures and potentially different cultures of GB and HD

Helpful TipYou may have a slightly different list. Whatever your approach, we love to see candidates come at a problem in more than one way, but still address the issue as directly and practically as possible.

Advertisements

Comments»

No comments yet — be the first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: